Application of Weighted Factors for the Calculation of the NPR in the AMEF Procedure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/revig1.4-24Keywords:
FMEA, NPR, cost, weighting, weighting factors.Abstract
The application of the FMEA (Failure Mode and Effect Analysis) is of the utmost importance in industries, since it allows identifying possible failures in the design of the product or process, the effects of those failures and the actions that eliminate or reduce those effects. However, the results obtained with the current procedure for calculating the Risk Priority Number (NPR) cannot be used as a criterion to establish the order of the improvements required to remove or reduce the failure modes, since within the same FMEA, a repeated NPR in different potential failures can be found. This research proposes a method to define the order in which product or process defects must be solved to facilitate the implementation of the necessary actions to improve the design. First, the effects of the introduction of weighted factors in the calculation of the NPR are identified, based on the cost of the points involved in each of the failure modes, that is, how much the severity, occurrence, and detection of a failure costs to the company. The analysis is presented, adding this weight to the procedure to obtain the NPR, finally the results are displayed.
Downloads
References
Chrysler LLC, Ford Motor Company, & General Motors Corporation. (2008). Potential Failure Mode and Effects Analysis FMEA Reference Manual (4th ed.) AIAG.
Denisis, A., Millán G., Millán, F., Moya, G., Soler, A., Colella, V. (2012). Detección y análisis de fallas. Análisis de modos y efectos de fallas. Universidad Nacional Experimental Politécnica Antonio José de Sucre.
Gilchrist W. (1993). Modeling failure modes and effects. International Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, pp .1-23.
Kmenta, S., & Ishii, K. (2000). Scenario-Based FMEA: A Life Cycle Cost Perspective. Volume 5: 14th Reliability, Stress Analysis, and Failure Prevention Conference; 7th Flexible Assembly Conference. https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2000/rsafp-14478
Lange, K., Leggett, S., & Baker, B. (2001). Potential failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) reference manual. AIAG, Southfield, Michigan.
Liu, H. C., Liu, L., & Liu, N. (2013). Risk evaluation approaches in failure mode and effects analysis: A literature review. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(2), 828–838. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2012.08.010
McDermott, R. E., Mikulak, R. J., & Beauregard, M. R. (2009). FMEA. New York: Taylor & Francis Group.
Rasmussen, N. C. (1981). The application of probabilistic risk assessment techniques to energy technologies. Annual Review of Energy, 6(1), 123-138.
Rhee, S. J., & Ishii, K. (2003). Using cost based FMEA to enhance reliability and serviceability. Advanced engineering informatics, 17(3-4), 179-188.
Sharma, K. D., & Srivastava, S. (2018). Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) implementation: a literature review. Journal of Advanced Research Aeronautical Space Science, 5, 1-17.
Spreafico, C., Russo, D., & Rizzi, C. (2017). A state-of-the-art review of FMEA/FMECA including patents. Computer Science Review, 25, 19-28.
Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2.a ed.). American Society for Quality ASQ.
Stamatis, D. H. (2018). Advanced product quality planning: the road to success. CRC Press.
Xiao, N., Huang, H. Z., Li, Y., He, L., & Jin, T. (2011). Multiple failure modes analysis and weighted risk priority number evaluation in FMEA. Engineering Failure Analysis, 18(4), 1162-1170.
Xu, K., Tang, L. C., Xie, M., Ho, S. L., & Zhu, M. L. (2002). Fuzzy assessment of FMEA for engine systems. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 75(1), 17-29.
Published
Versions
- 2025-06-17 (2)
- 2025-06-11 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Revista Ingeniería y Gestión Industrial

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.